IntroductionThis is the season you hear and read about the “January Effect”. Historically the market has tended to rally in January. Why? The conventional wisdom surrounding the theory says that in good years, investors sell their losses in December to offset profits in order to reduce their tax bite. This selling, at some point exhausts itself and new monies eventually enter the market from sources such as bonuses, (COLA) and merit raises then help to push the market higher.
Investor psychology may partially account for why they wait to do much of their selling in late December: Most investors hate to take losses! The New Year provides another 365 days for the remaining losers to come back or be used for tax selling in the future.
Investors and stock market participants are always on the prowl for a quick and easy indicator of the market’s direction. Warning! There is a saying “Whenever you find the key to the markets. They change the locks.”
How valid is the theory?Many of us wonder if there are months when we should avoid the market entirely and also ask the question are there months when we should be fully invested because the market always rises (or tends to always rise)? Terms such as the “Santa Claus Rally” and the “January Effect” are tossed around rather loosely in news headlines and among investors wishing to gain some type of edge.
The theory doesn’t come without its detractors. One point of view for the upcoming year at
Investopodia.com and goes as follows:
The January Effect has not happened in years because the markets have priced in the effects. Furthermore, this phenomenon is said to effect small-caps more than mid/large caps.Another reason the January effect is considered a nonevent is because of an aging population, and as a result more and more people are using tax sheltered retirement plans. For the increasing number of people using tax sheltered plans, tax loss selling near the end of the year is pointless.Although the theory does seem to be debated every year, it does have an academic following and has been studied in detail for quite a few years. A brief history of the topic can be found at
The January Effect: An Overview of the Debated Market Trend: The name was coined by Donald Kiem in the early 1980s. In a graduate research paper at the University of Chicago, Kiem reported the exceptional returns of small-cap stocks during January in the years 1963 to 1979. Moreover, he found that the bulk of the outperformance occurred in the first week of the month. Today, Kiem, who is a professor of finance at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Finance, says "…though it [the January effect] may be slightly smaller, it is still very significant statistically."
The trend continued beyond 1979 as January provided small-cap stock investors with investment returns above those of large company stocks […] Small-cap stocks also continued to perform better in January than they did during the rest of the year.
One of the more often cited causes of the January effect is year-end tax-loss selling. In this situation, investors create losses in some holdings to offset gains in others to reduce their tax liability. Then they buy back these investments or others in January. But Professor Kiem notes that because taxes are irrelevant for tax-sheltered investors this factor may have minimal influence.
Other explanations have centered around large asset inflows from institutional investors or year-end repositioning of portfolios by professional money managers. However, if institutional investors (such as retirement plans) were the only reason, then it would be reasonable to see the prices of large-cap and mid-cap stocks rise as much as small-cap stocks in January. Market history doesn’t support this theory.
“As goes January, so goes the market”Some articles intermingle the old saying “as goes January, so goes the market” with “The January Effect”. Here’s an article that has the January Effect in the title, then goes on to use the term “January Barometer”:
The "January Barometer" has been a precise forecasting tool. In the 34 years since 1950 when the Standard & Poor's 500 index posted gains in January, it finished down for the year only three times. The 18 times it fell in January it finished down 66% of the time. –
USA Today January Effect? A good start could mean a good year - or notIs January really better?Do stocks actually rise more in some months than others? Different studies look at different time periods.
MoneyChimp.com has an
interesting tool that allows you to select the time period and the month to determine superior returns.
Our observations, thoughts and experience.For whatever reason(s), there has appeared to be a statistically significant group of stocks have tended to under-perform the market averages “sometime in the last quarter of the year” and outperform the market averages in the period “beginning sometime in the last few days of the year through the first month or two of the following year”.
In our experience these stocks “tended to be” smaller-cap stocks. However, they were not solely limited to small cap stocks. Was this “effect” due to tax loss factors, year end money flows from pay bonuses, portfolio manager window dressing, portfolio restructuring, mean reversion tendencies or some other phenomena? We’re not sure. Remember, there are caveats to some of the studies. When the studies speak of “underperforming stocks” and “overperforming stocks” they’re talking about relative terms. For example one group of stocks could be down 20 percent and if the market is down 50%, the selected group would “greatly outperform” the market averages.
More Information on the January EffectThe January Effect appears to be a rather interesting enigma. If you
search on Google under “January Effect”, there’s much more information on the topic. You can also search for current articles and headlines in
Google Search: "january effect" for recent news stories on the topic